Legal Opinion · Dissent

Housley v. Housley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1964No. 5-3302Published

1DissentSam Robinson, Associate Justice

I fully agree that the intention of the testator has been thwarted. In fact, it has been blocked, obstructed and defeated, all on the theory that doubtful language in the will creates a trust, and yet in the same breath the majority says no valid trust was created. There was a devise absolutely to a brother; therefore, I say the doubtful language should not he construed as creating a trust, valid or invalid.

In this case the intention of the testator is clear. If there is any doubt about how the will should be construed, it should be construed so as to give effect to the intention of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burnes v. BurnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Galloway v. DarbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Bernstein v. BrambleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Moody v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  5. Ross v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API