Commonwealth v. White
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentChief Justice Cappy
I dissent.
Today, in short order, the majority ignores the principle of stare decisis by overruling a three-year-old decision of this court, eviscerates the final order rule, erroneously reverses a trial judge’s determination that she can be a fair and impartial jurist, and undermines a defendant’s right to plead guilty to *673murder. For these reasons, I can join no part of the majority opinion.
In Commonwealth v. Cosnek, 575 Pa. 411, 836 A.2d 871 (2003), this court construed Rule 311(d) regarding interlocutory appeals of right. In that case, we explained that the “plain language” of the rule…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.