Legal Opinion

Sallee v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff (respondent) brought this action against the defendant railroad corporation to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him on March 8, 1924, while he was in the employ of defendant as a switchman in defendant's railroad yards in the city of St. Louis. The action is brought under the provisions of the Federal Employers' Liability Act and the Federal Safety Appliance Act. It is not disputed by defendant (appellant) that the action properly falls within the purview of those two acts of Congress, and hence it stands unquestioned that the action was well brought. Besides, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Browning v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Jablonowski v. Modern Cap Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. Powell v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keyes v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Wild v. PitcairnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Henderson v. Twin Falis CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HartmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Radler v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API