Legal Opinion

People v. Winden

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 24, 1984No. 83SA335PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

The People brought this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 challenging an order of the trial court granting defendants’ motions to suppress certain tangible evidence and statements. We reverse and remand.

I

On February 15, 1983, four members of the Pueblo Police Department and two Pueblo County deputy sheriffs executed a search warrant issued that day to search premises described as “544 Clarion Dr. Pueblo West Colorado.” At that time, the residence was occupied by defendants David Winden and Ben Montgomery. The search revealed approximately thirty pounds of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. John MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. UnruhSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. PageColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. KazmierskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. GradySupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. People v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API