Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Belt Parkway Imaging, P.C.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*811OPINION OF THE COURT
Karla Moskowitz, J.
Plaintiffs move for an order: (1) pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) and 1003, granting them leave to serve a second amended complaint to add the insurers Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company and GEICO Casualty Company (collectively GEICO) as plaintiffs, deeming the second amended complaint served upon defendants and directing defendants to answer the second amended complaint; (2) pursuant to CPLR 2221 (e), granting plaintiffs’ motion to renew the court’s March 15, 2004 decision and order (prior decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Roundabout Theatre Co. v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- A.T. Medical v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GrafmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Metroscan Imaging, P.C. v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- Allstate Insurance v. Belt Parkway Imaging, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006