Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided August 1, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Paul Miller State Senator Post Office Box 488 Melbourne, AR 72556-9511

Dear Senator Miller:

I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on nine questions involving various matters pertaining to the law as it applies to Cherokee Village Suburban Improvement District (hereinafter "the District" or "SID"). I will address your questions individually, in the order posed.

Question 1 — Cherokee Village Suburban District No. 1 (the District), wascreated in 1969 in accordance with the provisions of Act 41 as amended,(particularly Act 286). Proposed administrative actions by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quapaw Central Business Improvement District v. Bond-Kinman, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Nakdimen v. Fort Smith & Van Buren Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Pulaski County v. Carriage Creek Property Owners Improvement District No. 639Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Memphis Trust Co. v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  5. Carter v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API