People v. Murray
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
— The defendant was convicted of robbery, and appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial. He was charged with taking, forcibly and feloniously, from one Henry Braker, a certain watch and chain of the value of thirty dollars. The only witnesses on the part of the prosecution were the prosecuting witness, Braker, and two policemen, who arrested the defendant. Braker testified that on the night between November 9 and 10, 1889, he was sleeping in an old cabin (which had been part of the sleeping apartment of a boat), at the foot of Kearny Street, San Francisco; that one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. Fong ChingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Redington v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. LightfootSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- People v. Van EwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. FaulkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.