Legal Opinion

Lippman v. Romich

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1928No. 5387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was a libel in rem and in personam to recover damages suffered by the libelant through the use of a dangerous and defective stove while employed as cook on the gasoline schooner Talayha. On final hearing, the court below found that the charge of negligence had not been sustained, and ordered a dismissal of the libel, but later a decree in personam was awarded in favor of the libelant and against the owner for medical, hospital, and other expenses incident to a cure. Erom this decree the owner has appealed, contending, first, that at the time of receiving the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. The MontezumaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Hammond Lumber Co. v. SandinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  5. Union Trust Co. of Spokane v. WisemanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lykes Brothers-Ripley S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Owens v. Hammond Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1934
  3. Smith v. Lykes Brothers-Ripley S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API