Taylor v. Claypool
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
Taylor brought an action of assumpsit against 'William H. Moseley and William W. Claypool, on a joint promissory note. The writ was returned non est inventus as to Moseley. Claypool appeared and pleaded as follows: That the plaintiff hei'etofore, &c., impleaded the defendant and Moseley, &c., for not performing the same promises, &c.; and that the plaintiff in that suit (it being suggested that the writ had been served on Moseley and not on Claypool) obtained a judgment against Moseley for the amount due, &c. General demurrer to the plea, and judgment for the defendant.
This is a joint action…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sheehy v. Mandeville & JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Robertson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1821
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kennard v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Brady v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Carter v. BerkshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1846