Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
On the morning of January 3, 1929, the plaintiff Lillian M. Parsons slipped and fell on a sidewalk in front of the *196premises owned by the defendant George M. Knobles, and leased by the defendant Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, at 21 Front street in the city of Rochester, N. Y. Claiming that this icy condition constituted a nuisance for which both defendants were negligent, Mrs. Parsons brings this action against both owner and lessee to recover the damages sustained by her as a result of her fall; and her husband, William A. Parsons, brings a companion action to recover for the loss of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tremblay v. . Harmony MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Venable v. Consolidated Dry Goods Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Venable v. Consolidated Dry Goods CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Crounse v. SagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Honigsberg v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964