Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bolles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 1869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the District of Wisconsin ; the case being thus: Bolles, a citizen of Massachusetts, on behalf of himself and all other stockholders of the Mineral Point Mining Company, tiled his bill of complaint in the court below against one Jones, and the said company, the former a citizen, and the latter a corporation, of Wisconsin, for an injunction to restrain Jones from suing for, claiming or demanding against the said company the purchase-money of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the District of Wisconsin ; the case being thus: Bolles, a citizen of Massachusetts, on behalf of himself and all other stockholders of the Mineral Point Mining Company, tiled his bill of complaint in the court below against one Jones, and the said company, the former a citizen, and the latter a corporation, of Wisconsin, for an injunction to restrain Jones from suing for, claiming or demanding against the said company the purchase-money of a certain tract of mining land in Wisconsin, or any mineral rents for mineral raised on the same. The matter set forth…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

We have examined the proofs in the cause and find them to be very full and convincing against the appellant, and are satisfied with the decree of the Circuit Court, unless the same be invalid for some jurisdictional or technical reason.

It is objected that a court of equity has no jurisdiction of the case because the law affords a' complete remedy in damages. This objection is groundless. Equity has always had jurisdiction of fraud, misrepresentation, and concealment; and it does not depend on discovery. But in this case a court of law could not give adequate relief. The agreement complained…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API