Legal Opinion

Hall v. Nashville & Chattanooga Rail Road

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT J.

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action on the case, to recover damages for the loss of the life of David Hall he being under the age of twenty-one years and the son and servant of the plaintiff, in consequence of the carelessness, negligence, unskil-fulness and default of the defendant’s servants and agents, by means whereof, the plaintiff was deprived of the assistance, services, society and comfort of his said son and servant.

A demurrer was filed to the declaration and sustained by the criminal court, and the question is, whether this judgment can be maintained.

Numero…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oldfield v. . the N.Y. and Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Ford v. MonroeNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Worley v. Cincinnati, Hamilton, & Dayton RailroadOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1855

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Truskett v. ClosserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Holston v. Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Trafford v. Adams Express Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1881
  5. In re the Compulsory Accounting of HannaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API