Legal Opinion

Stenner v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 23, 2013No. AC 34164PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Jeffrey R. Stenner, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas coipus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal and that the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was improper because his trial *373counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate adequately and to present to the jury the theory that a coconspirator had reason to kill the victim. We…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Tutson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Stenner v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Campbell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. State v. StennerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Pereira v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Schuler v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  4. Atkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. Kowalyshyn v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API