Legal Opinion

Wike v. Allison

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1964No. 5214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

In order to recover at common law, the plaintiff had the burden of proving that the defendant, who owned the dog which bit him, knew or had reason to know that his dog had vicious propensities. McIntire v. Plaisted, 57 N. H. 606, 609; Gagnon v. Frank, 83 N. H. 122, 123; Restatement, Torts, ss. 509, 518; 4 Am. Jur. 2d 332.

Plaintiff testified that the dog “didn’t look dangerous to me.” Defendant and his wife testified they did not believe the dog, a German shepherd, about five years old, constituted a danger to anybody, nobody ever complained about him and he never bit anyone before. They…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. West v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bohan v. RitzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Allgeyer v. LincolnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. DeRoy v. CoppSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Hewes v. RobySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Sindorf v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API