State v. Farley
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
Once again we are confronted with a claim that a volunteered 1 spontaneous confession was improperly admitted into evidence because of a claimed failure of the officers to give the complete warning described in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
In State v. Taylor, Me., 343 A.2d 11 (1975) and State v. Lafferty, Me., 309 A. 2d 647 (1973), the same argument was raised.
In both cases the argument availed the appellants of nothing.
On this third occasion when the issue is raised, appellant’s argument is likewise fruitless.
In Lafferty, supra, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- State v. LaffertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. SimoneauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. BroucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. CapitanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- State v. CatlinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.