Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 2014No. Nos. 1D13-2516, 1D13-2517, 1D13-2518PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

In these consolidated cases, Arthur O’Derrell Franklin, Appellant, appeals the partial summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Below, he argued that his several concurrent sentences of 1,000 years in prison, imposed in 1984 for crimes committed in 1983, are unconstitutional under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), despite the fact that they are parole-eligible. The circuit court rejected this claim, and Appellant now argues that he was entitled to either resentencing or an evi-dentiary hearing and to counsel to assist him at either…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Floyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arthur O'Derrell Franklin v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Angelo Atwell v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. Angelo Atwell v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. Arthur O'Derrell Franklin v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. Arthur O'Derrell Franklin v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API