Legal Opinion

Howell v. Reupke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated February 17, 2004, which granted the respective motions of the defendants Edward P. Reupke and Robert J. Kaiser for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and, upon searching the record, awarded summary judgment to the defendant Rafael A. Mascol, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Sainte-Aime v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Smith v. AskewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Arshad v. GomerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. Ali v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Baksh v. US Tow, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API