Legal Opinion

Davis & Co. v. Preston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1912No. 4438PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trover; from city court of Columbus—Judge Tigner. July 8, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

Preston sued Davis & Smith as partners. His petition was substantially as follows: The defendants have injured and damaged petitioner in the sum of $300 or other large amount. Plaintiff was the owner of a bay mare mule worth $100. He .exchanged this mule with the agent of the defendants for a sorrel mare, and gave his note for $85 “to boot.” At the time of the trade, defendants’ agent represented that the mare was a good worker to both wagon and plough, that she was sound, and would do the work of a good mule, that she had been bred to a jack, and that she would “drop a colt” within a few…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Americus Grocery Co. v. Brackett & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Sasser v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Johnson v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horne & Ponder v. O. B. & E. J. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Edenfield v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Patterson v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Autry v. PalmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API