Barnett v. Ruotolo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A Support Magistrate is permitted to impute income in calculating a support obligation where he or she finds that a party’s account of their finances is not credible or suspect (see DeVries v DeVries, 35 AD3d 794 [2006]; Matter of Westenberger v Westenberger, 23 AD3d 571 [2005]; Peri v Peri, 2 AD3d 425 [2003]; Lilikakis v Lilikakis, 308 AD2d 435 [2003]). “However, in exercising the discretion to impute income to a party, a Support Magistrate is required to provide a clear record of the source from which the income is imputed and the reasons for such imputation” (Matter of Kristy Helen T. v…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strella v. FerroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- DeVries v. DeVriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lilikakis v. LilikakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Westenberger v. WestenbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Peri v. PeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rohme v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Sena v. SenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Gravenese v. MarcheseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Khaimova v. MosheyevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Barmoha v. EisayevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.