Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Schrader v. Bell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1989No. 89-138Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I am pleased to see that the majority has, somewhat belatedly, joined my dissent in Penny v. Phillips, 298 Ark. 481, 769 S.W.2d 4 (1989). The similarities between this case and Penny, decided a mere seven months ago, are striking. Penny involved a teenage-driver who didn’t see a curve and skidded off a road into a ditch, injuring a passenger. The driver had not been speeding, drinking, or violating any highway rule at the time of the accident, and the jury found no negligence on his or his parents’ part. The trial court ruled that the verdict was clearly against the preponderance of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Wilson v. KoberaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Penny v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API