Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2010No. 2006-SC-000654-MRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partScott, J.

Although I concur with the majority on the other issues, I must dissent as to the majority’s finding of an “implied acquittal” in Section I. of the majority opinion (including their reversal of Commonwealth v. Eldred, 973 S.W.2d 43 (Ky.1998) and Salinas v. Payne, 169 S.W.3d 536 (Ky.2005)), as well as their comment in Section IV. C. that, although they found the error regarding the tattoo testimony to be harmless, it may not have been harmless as to Appellant’s death sentence.

As to the error regarding the introduction of the tattoo evidence, I fail to see— given the voluminous evidence — how…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EldredKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Salinas v. PayneKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API