Legal Opinion

Perritt v. Dona

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 2002No. Nos. 35,628-CW, 35,724-CW, 35,841-CWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

h CARAWAY, J.

These three cases concern the sufficiency of the statement of plaintiffs claim before the medical review panel in a malpractice action. They have been consolidated for our review by remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court. Arnold v. Dona, 01-3073 (La.3/15/02), 812 So.2d 623; Perritt v. Dona, 01-3175 (La.3/15/02), 812 So.2d 624; and Richmond v. Brown, 2002-0241 (La.3/15/02), 812 So.2d 624. Two of the three cases involve the defendants’ use of written interrogatories for discovery which this court, in its initial supervisory rulings, found improper. We reaffirm those rulings and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pfiffner v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Everett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. Montalvo v. SondesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Haskins v. ClarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perritt v. DonaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Gelè v. BinderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Booker v. ByrdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API