Patterson v. T.L. Wallace Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentMaxwell, J.
¶ 22. The majority holds material factual disputes exist because it is unclear from the record who deposited the debris in the roadway. But it was not Turtle Creek or TLW’s burden, as the defendants, to provide evidence that someone else was responsible for the debris in the roadway. Rather, to survive summary judgment, Patterson had the burden, as the plaintiff, to provide sufficient probative evidence that either Turtle Creek or TLW was responsible for the dangerous condition on Cross Creek Parkway. Because I agree with the trial judge that Patterson did not present sufficient evidence to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Read v. Southern Pine Elec. Power Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. TisdaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- K-Mart Corp. v. Hardy Ex Rel. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Chisolm v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.