Legal Opinion
Covino v. Hagemann
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis Sangiorgio, J.
Before the court is a motion to dismiss the three causes of *466action asserted in the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), and to further dismiss plaintiffs claim for attorneys’ fees.
The salient facts are not in dispute. In July of 1994, both plaintiff and defendant were officials in the office of the Staten Island Borough President. Plaintiff was (and remains) the Director of Contract Oversight, and defendant was Chief Investigator of the office’s Investigations Unit. A disagreement arose between the parties over the handling of a matter concerning…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Steinhilber v. AlphonseNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gross v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Immuno AG. v. Moor-JankowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hagemann v. MolinariDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- CHENG v. NEUMANNDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- Walpole v. Charleston CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Walpole v. Charleston CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019