Fralich v. Despar
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 227, Oct. T., 1894, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1894, No. 232, for plaintiff on bill in equity. Bill for injunction to restrain defendant- from disclosing trade secrets and from manufacturing goods. The following opinion was filed bjr Ewing, P. J.: “EINDINGS OE EACT BY THE COURT.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 227, Oct. T., 1894, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1894, No. 232, for plaintiff on bill in equity. Bill for injunction to restrain defendant- from disclosing trade secrets and from manufacturing goods. The following opinion was filed bjr Ewing, P. J.: “EINDINGS OE EACT BY THE COURT. “The defendant, Andrew Despar, on the 5th day of January, 1886, entered into articles of agreement with the plaintiff, in the form of an affidavit, as follows: “‘I, Andrew Despar, of the city of Pittsburg, state of Pennsylvania, in the employ of E. C. Fralich, a…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We think the findings of fact and conclusions of law as contained in the opinion of the learned court below are fully sustained by the evidence and authorities cited, and Upon that opinion, the decree of the court below is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
2Cited by11 opinions
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Felmlee v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wexler v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Stone v. GossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Ecolaire Inc. v. CrissmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.