Legal Opinion

People v. Rondu Parrish Smitherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 19, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*353The defendant contends that the trial court should have charged assault in the second degree as a lesser-included offense of assault in the first degree because a reasonable view of the evidence could support a finding that he recklessly caused serious physical injury to the complainant (see Penal Law § 120.05 [4]). However, the defendant’s request at trial to charge second degree assault as a lesser-included offense was based solely upon the theory that he intended to cause physical injury rather than serious physical injury to the complainant (see Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). Thus, his present…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. BorrelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. RookeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. HeggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. MendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API