Legal Opinion

Shingler v. Furst

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 1935No. 24678Published

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The “costs” which the Code of 1933, § 6-105, requires to be paid as a prerequisite to an appeal are “all costs which may have accrued in the case up to the time of entering such appeal.” On an application by a widow for a year’s support under the Code, § 113-1002 et seq., “the duties of the appraisers who are appointed . . are purely ministerial; . . but the return after all is but the report of a committee. While it is true that in practice this report or return of the appraisers is as a matter of course approved by the court of ordinary unless objection be filed, still citation must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winn v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Chambliss v. BoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Holamon v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Pope v. HaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  5. Waldrop v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API