Legal Opinion
Scott v. City of Mountain Brook
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 31, 1992No. 1900509PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
602 So.2d 893 (1992)
Andrew C. SCOTT and Walter F. Scott, Jr.
v.
CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK, a Municipal Corporation.
1900509.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
July 31, 1992.
Deidre W. Lee, Fairhope, for appellants.
Mark W. Lee of Parsons, Lee & Juliano, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee.
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs, Andrew C. Scott and Walter F. Scott, Jr., appeal from summary judgments in favor of the defendant, the City of Mountain Brook. The claims underlying these judgments involve the action of the Mountain Brook city council and the mayor of Mountain Brook in refusing to approve a bond issue that would assist the Scotts…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Gross v. Lowder Rlty. Better Homes & GardensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Eidson v. Olin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Hilliard v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Neighbors v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Williams v. MarcumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
4Cited by14 opinions
- Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Couch v. City of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Altmayer v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Harden v. City of Muscle Shoals) (In re City of Muscle Shoals ()Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.