Legal Opinion

Nicol v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carswell, J.:

The board of education appointed plaintiff a district superintendent in November, 1923. The board appointed her on the theory that she had the qualifications prescribed by section 40 of the by-laws of the board of education. It assumed that said section 40 was then in force and effect. The State Commissioner of Education in a proceeding to which said Nicol was not a party subsequently held that the board’s action in appointing said Nicol was invalid in that section 40 of the by-laws had been superseded by section 869 of the Education Law, enacted by Laws of 1917, chapter 786, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HelbraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Clyda TarrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  3. Dolan v. KroneNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Clyda TarrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API