Nicol v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Carswell, J.:
The board of education appointed plaintiff a district superintendent in November, 1923. The board appointed her on the theory that she had the qualifications prescribed by section 40 of the by-laws of the board of education. It assumed that said section 40 was then in force and effect. The State Commissioner of Education in a proceeding to which said Nicol was not a party subsequently held that the board’s action in appointing said Nicol was invalid in that section 40 of the by-laws had been superseded by section 869 of the Education Law, enacted by Laws of 1917, chapter 786, and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. HelbraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Clyda TarrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Dolan v. KroneNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Clyda TarrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957