Kenworthy v. Tullis
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Trespass quare clausum fregit by the appellant against the appellees. The first count alleges that the defendants broke and entered the close of the plaintiff, put him out of possession, and deprived him of the use and occupation of it. The second count charges that the defendants dug a certain mill-race and mill-pit, and erected certain mills upon the said close, thereby encumbering it, &c. Plea, the general issue; with an agreement that all legal matters of defense, which might be given in evidence under any form of pleadings, should be admitted. The judgment was for the defendant.
The…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Utter v. SidmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Flaten v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Harris v. StrawbridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.