Legal Opinion

(HC) Zimmerman v. Neuschmid

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 13, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01736Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH ZIMMERMAN, No. 2:19-cv-01736-TLN-GGH 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Kenneth Zimmerman (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed 18 this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 20 302. 21 On September 17, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Donald Milton Orand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Bruce Wayne Morris v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API