Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Mendelsohn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 24, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District. Action by Pauline Wolf against Samuel Mendelsohn. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Modified. .

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The only question is whether, upon all the facts, construing the evidence most favorably to plaintiff, the recovery should be reduced, and, if so, how much. The contract between the owner, Mendelsohn, and the principal contractor, Jansen, called for a gross payment of $1,475, payable in installments; the final payment when the work was finished being $650. Of the work contracted for, a part, of the value of $250, was done by a contractor other than Jansen, leaving the whole amount to be paid to the latter $1,225. The owner did not insist upon the condition as to payments, but paid Jansen from…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Behrer v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Wagner v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API