Legal Opinion
Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 22, 2012No. CA 11-733-LPSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*450 MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
Pending before the Court is the issue of claim construction of various disputed terms found in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,028,222 (the “'222 patent”) and 6,992,218 (the “'218 patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”).
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and SCR Pharmatop (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this patent infringement action against defendants Paddock Laboratories, Inc., Perrigo Company, Paddock Laboratories, LLC, Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC, Exela PharmSci, Inc., and Exela Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) on August…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cadence Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Lupin Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Ingenus Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Sequoia Technology, LLC v. Dell, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. Powder Springs Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019