Toni Feibusch v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan, and Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge.
Toni Feibusch (“Feibusch”) appeals the district court’s decision that Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (“Sun Life”) did not abuse its discretion in terminating her disability benefits. Feibusch’s principal argument is that the district court incorrectly applied abuse of discretion review rather than de novo review. Feibusch was denied benefits under policy language that states that proof of a disability claim “must be satisfactory to Sun Life.”
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we hold that de novo review applies under the policy language at issue. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Martha Kinstler v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Viera v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Gross v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Michael Manuel v. Turner Industries Group, LLC, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Beth Cosey v. The Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Stephanie C. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.