Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1983No. Nos. 82-329, 82-330Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is a post conviction proceeding. The District Court, after review of the files and records of the case, found that the defendant was entitled to no relief and that an evidentiary hearing was not required. The court therefore denied defendant’s motion for post conviction relief and this appeal followed.

The facts in these cases are set out at length in the defendant’s direct appeals. State v. Moore, 208 Neb. 240, 302 N.W.2d 728 (1981). In that case this court held that where delayed consecutive sentences for sexual offenses are pronounced, credit for time served under a prior sexual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PeeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. FreemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API