Legal Opinion

Baum v. Birchall

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1892No. Appeal, No. 191PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal, No. 191, Jan. T., 1892, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1890, No. 421, opening judgment, entered on bond and warrant of attorney against Henry C. Birchall and Sallie S. Birchall his wife, as to Sallie S. Birchall, said bond accompanying a purchase-money mortgage on real estate in Delaware, purchased by said wife while domiciled in Pennsylvania. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 191, Jan. T., 1892, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1890, No. 421, opening judgment, entered on bond and warrant of attorney against Henry C. Birchall and Sallie S. Birchall his wife, as to Sallie S. Birchall, said bond accompanying a purchase-money mortgage on real estate in Delaware, purchased by said wife while domiciled in Pennsylvania. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The bond did not name Mrs. Birchall as a married woman, and the warrant of attorney empowered “ any attorney or prothonotary of any court of record in the state of Delaware…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Williams,

The defendants are and were at the date of the bond on which this judgment was entered husband and wife. In the winter of 1884-5 they lived in this state near Philadelphia. Desiring to remove to Delaware they visited Dover and its vicinity in February in 1885 in search of a suitable farm on which to make their home. Among the farms examined by them was that of Baum the plaintiff, from whom they got the price and terms of payment at which he would sell. They then returned to their home near Philadelphia; but H. C. Birchall, the husband, soon after returned to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milliken v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Hill v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Evans v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Brown v. Camden & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. McAdamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Thomson v. KyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  4. Poole v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Wick v. DawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API