Security Products Co. v. Booker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This suit was brought to caucel a deed of the State Land Commissioner to appellant based- upon a forfeiture of certain lands to the .state in 1932 for the nonpayment of the taxes due thereon for the year Í931v
Four defects were alleged in the said sale in the original complaint, but all are of a character which act 142 of the Acts of 1935 would cure, as the suit was. pending when that aot was repealed. Carle v. Gehl, 193 Ark. 1061, 104 S. W. 2d 445; Burbridge v. Crawford, ante p. 191, 112 S. W. 2d 423.
The decree from which is this appeal held that the sale was void. This decree contains the '…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carle v. GehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Fletcher v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Baldwin v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Weaver-Dowdy Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reynolds v. PlantsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Chronister v. SkidmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Luebke v. HoltzendorffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Sanderson v. WallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Chronister v. SkidmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939