Legal Opinion

Bramer v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that, inter alia, declared that defendants-respondents (hereafter, defendants) are not obligated to defend or indemnify plaintiff in an underlying action commenced by New York State pursuant to Navigation Law § 181 seeking to recover the cost of remediating petroleum contamination (State of New York v Essex Prop. Mgt., LLC, 12 AD3d 1123 [2004]). We affirm.

It is well settled that notice provisions of an insurance policy *1793“operate[ ] as a condition precedent to coverage” (White v City of New York, 81 NY2d 955, 957 [1993]), and that the insurer is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Winstead v. Uniondale Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. In re the Arbitration between Travelers Insurance & DeLoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Genesee Valley Improvement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API