Legal Opinion

Bonner v. Stroud Brothers' Gin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be stated that all the mortgages show that the cotton was to be planted and grown in the State of Oklahoma, and, by their terms, show that the contracts which they evidence were to be performed there. Hence in construing the mortgages and in determining their priority we must be governed by the laws of the State of Oklahoma. Tallmam v. Union Loan & Trust Co., 161 Ark. 614, 256 S. W. 379; Guardian Life Insurance Co. v. Dixon, 152 Ark. 597, 240 S. W. 25; Wilson v. Todhunter, 137 Ark. 80, 207 S. W. 221; and Nelson v. Forbes & Sons, 164…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guardian Life Insurance v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Wichita Mill & Elevator Co. v. Farmers' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Wilson v. TodhunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Nelson v. Forbes & SonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Watson v. PughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Offenhauser & Co. v. CuppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Valleyfield Gin Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API