Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. City of Mattoon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of Error to the Comity Court of Coles county; the Hon. L. 0. Henley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

A special assessment upon the lots and property of plaintiffs in error for the grading, curbing and paving with brick of West First street, in the city of Mattoon, was confirmed by the county court, and the cause has been brought here by writ of error.

The judgment of the county court is questioned on the ground that the ordinance for the improvement does not specify the nature, character and description of such improvement. It is not claimed that the locality of the improvement is not sufficiently set forth, and in other respects the ordinance is a duplicate of the one considered in Moore v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunn v. RodgersIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Dennis v. MaynardIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Neff v. SmythIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Ogden v. Town of Lake ViewIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Adcock v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Arnold v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McChesney v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Board of Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 349 v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Treharne v. MatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Waite v. Commissioners of Green River Special Drainage DistIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API