Stanley v. Conner Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARD, Justice.
This is a usury case. The Plaintiff sued for usury penalties claiming that he was a comaker on a note executed by a corporation that he controlled. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the Defendant, holding as a matter of law that the Plaintiff was a guarantor on the corporation note and could not recover because of the prohibition contained in Article 1302-2.-09, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. We affirm.
John R. Stanley was the president and sole stockholder of Southern Pipe Line Corporation. In 1974, Southern contracted with Conner Construction Co. for the purpose of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- E'Town Shopping Center, Inc. v. Lexington Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Pinemont Bank v. DuCrozCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- V. I. P. Commercial Contractors v. AlkasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- R. J. Carter Enterprises, Inc. v. Greenway Bank & Trust of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981