Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Conner Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1983No. 7062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARD, Justice.

This is a usury case. The Plaintiff sued for usury penalties claiming that he was a comaker on a note executed by a corporation that he controlled. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the Defendant, holding as a matter of law that the Plaintiff was a guarantor on the corporation note and could not recover because of the prohibition contained in Article 1302-2.-09, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. We affirm.

John R. Stanley was the president and sole stockholder of Southern Pipe Line Corporation. In 1974, Southern contracted with Conner Construction Co. for the purpose of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. E'Town Shopping Center, Inc. v. Lexington Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  3. Pinemont Bank v. DuCrozCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. V. I. P. Commercial Contractors v. AlkasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. R. J. Carter Enterprises, Inc. v. Greenway Bank & Trust of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. El Paso Refining, Inc. v. Scurlock Permian Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API