Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1915No. 6198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. November 25, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury’s finding that credit for the goods included in the account sued on was extended by the plaintiff to the defendant (a married woman) in her individual capacity, and that she was liable for the same. See Connerat v. Goldsmith, 6 Ga. 14; Mitchell v. Treanor, 11 Ga. 324 (3, 4), 326 (56 Am. D. 421); Schofield v. Jones, 85 Ga. 816, 824 (11 S. E. 1032); Goodson v. Powell, 9 Ga. App. 497 (71 S. E. 765); Reynolds v. Starks, ante, 606 (85 S. E. 950).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict. There was no material error of law; and the judgment of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schofield v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Mitchell v. TreanorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Connerat v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  4. Goodson v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Reynolds v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Georgia Grocery Co. v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API