Legal Opinion

Donald R. Wells, class representative on behalf of himself and others similarly situated v. Holiday Companies, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 2015No. A14-1421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRK, Judge.

Appellant challenges the summary-judgment dismissal of this purported class-action lawsuit alleging that respondents violated Minn.Stat. § 325G.53 (2014) by issuing car-wash codes that expire. Because we conclude that the receipt containing a car-wash code that appellant received when he purchased a car wash is not a “gift certificate” under Minn.Stat. § 325G.53, subd. 1(a), we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents.

FACTS

The facts in this case are undisputed. On January 30, 2012, appellant Donald R. Wells purchased gas and a car wash at a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. County of Dakota v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. CarufelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Westrom v. Minnesota Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollis v. Audible IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  2. State v. SagatawCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API