Legal Opinion

Davis v. Federal Land Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The record is in a most unsatisfactory condition. There are two complaints, neither one of which appears in the record as an exhibit. It is impossible for us to determine whether the application for the restraining order was made in the action first instituted or in the second action. As to this counsel themselves cannot agree. The plaintiffs assert in their brief that application was made in the action instituted in April. The defendant asserts that it was made in the action instituted in May. The reference in the order of Nettles, J., would seem to make it appear that it was issued in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Williams v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Mitchell v. . TalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Foard v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Neighbors v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. In Re AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Davis v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API