Chandler v. State

Appellant was charged with the offense of having intoxicating liquor in his possession, in violation of §4 of the act of 1925 (Acts 1925 p. 144, §2717 Burns 1926). Jury trial resulted in a conviction.

Overruling of appellant’s motion for new trial is the only error properly assigned; and the only reasons for new trial presented are that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash search warrant and suppress the evidence.

It appears from the evidence that appellant’s house and premises were searched by two police…