Legal Opinion
Ametek-Thermox Instruments Division v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1992No. 1413 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
The instant case is before us on remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. See Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments Division, 526 Pa. 25, 584 A.2d 301 (1990). The relevant facts are as follows. Mark J. Pieper (Claimant) suffered a work-related back injury on October 8, 1982 for which he was paid workmen’s compensation benefits by Ametek-Thermox Instruments Division (Employer) pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. On April 11, 1983 he returned to work and signed a final receipt. Eleven days later he suffered a recurrence and benefits were reinstated by a supplemental…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Venanzio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- D. P. "Herk" Zimmerman, Jr., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Himes)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Brasco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- North Pittsburgh Drywall Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Solyan v. Fontana, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1988