Legal Opinion

Stephen F. Reddy and John W. Sorkvist v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Solomon Mayer, Barry Mayer, Shb Commodities, Inc., Maye Commodities Corp., and Steven Gelbstein v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 3, 1999No. 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

191 F.3d 109 (2nd Cir. 1999)

STEPHEN F. REDDY and JOHN W. SORKVIST, Petitioners,

v.

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Respondent.

SOLOMON MAYER, BARRY MAYER, SHB COMMODITIES, INC., MAYE COMMODITIES CORP., and STEVEN GELBSTEIN, Petitioners,

v.

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Respondent.

Docket Nos. 98-4070, 98-4071, 98-4099, 98-4100

August Term, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Argued: July 17, 1998

Decided: September 03, 1999

Petitions for review of two decisions of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which found that petitioners had violated the Commodity…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API