Legal Opinion
Frye v. Lee
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided March 9, 2000No. CIV.5:99CV108PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment and submitted portions of the record for review as well as legal briefs. Respondent has also filed a response to the petition. The undersigned concludes the record is adequate and finds an evidentiary hearing is unnecessary. Rule 8(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. For the reasons stated herein, the petition is denied.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ronald Wayne Frye v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Frye v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000