State Ex Rel. Stiegel v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
Petitioner, Harry Stiegel, Jr., procured writ of habeas corpus from this Court alleging that he is unlawfully detained by the Superintendent of the State Farm at Raiford, Florida.
The return shows that he is held in custody in the State Prison of the State of Florida by virtue of a commitment issuing out of the Circuit Court of Martin County pursuant to a conviction of the offense of assault with intent to commit a felony, to-wit, grand larceny, and a judgment that for such offense he be confined'in the State Prison for two and one-half years from November 9, 1934. He is now serving such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Ex parte SimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Ex Parte Elmo KittsSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Faison v. VestalSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- State ex rel. Johnson v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Powell v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1936