Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Underwood
I write no brief for an employer who tells an industrially injured employee that the employee will be discharged if a claim for compensation is filed. Such statements, even when accompanied by assurances that all expenses connected with the injury will be paid, really do not appeal to one’s sense of fairness. Plaintiff’s arguments in favor of a cause of action for retaliatory discharges, if limited to compensatory damages, have considerable appeal, and such an action may well be a desirable remedy for such discharges. My disagreement with the majority stems from my belief that the merits of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.